When using asyncio.create_task(function1)
and asyncio.create_task(function2)
, you are creating two asynchronous tasks that will run concurrently within the same event loop. Whether or not these tasks run efficiently depends on the nature of the tasks themselves.
Understanding Asynchronous Tasks
If function1
and function2
are asynchronous functions (i.e., they use async def
and contain await
statements), they will run efficiently as long as they perform non-blocking operations, such as:
- Network I/O
- Disk I/O
- Timers (e.g.,
await asyncio.sleep()
) - Other asynchronous operations
In this situation, asyncio
will handle the scheduling, suspending tasks when they are waiting for I/O operations to complete, and resuming them when the operations are ready. This results in efficient concurrency.
Inefficiency with Blocking Code
If function1
and function2
contain blocking operations (e.g., CPU-bound tasks, time.sleep()
, or blocking I/O), they will not run efficiently. Blocking code will block the entire event loop, preventing other tasks from running concurrently.
Example of Efficient Async Tasks
Here’s an example of efficiently running non-blocking asynchronous tasks using asyncio.create_task()
:
import asyncio |
Handling Blocking Code with Executors
If you need to run blocking I/O tasks, you should offload them to a thread or process pool to avoid blocking the event loop:
import asyncio |
Summary
- Efficient Async Tasks: Use
async def
functions withawait
statements for non-blocking operations. - Handling Blocking Code: Offload blocking tasks to a thread or process pool using
loop.run_in_executor
.
By carefully distinguishing between blocking and non-blocking tasks, you can ensure that your tasks run efficiently when using asyncio.create_task()
.